Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

Author Guidelines

Form and Preparation of Original Articles

Authors will exclusively submit through the OJS platform, in a format compatible with the Microsoft Word word processor (extensions ".doc" or ".docx"). The writings may have a maximum length of 10,000 words or 30 pages in letter size with a 1.5 spacing in Arial 12 font, including notes, tables, graphs, illustrations, citations, and bibliographic references. Articles and essays should include institutional affiliation of the authors in the following way: nationality, academic degree, institution (department or faculty and University), city, country, email, and ORCID registration. It should be specified if the article is a product of a research project, and if so, which institution funded it. If there is more than one contributor, the first name will correspond to the main author and the following to co-authors. In no case should the total number of author names exceed four people. Articles should include an abstract of up to 100 words (approximately 10 lines), specifying the main objectives, sources, and research results. Following the abstract, a list of three to six keywords should be attached, preferably chosen from the UNESCO Thesaurus (http://databases.unesco.org/thessp/). The title, abstract, and keywords should be in both Spanish and English.

The formal structure of the article should be as follows:

  1. Title (centered and bold)
  2. Title translated into English
  3. Author's Name (aligned to the right) with a footnote indicating academic degree, institution (department or faculty and University), city, country, email, and ORCID registration
  4. Abstract in Spanish (centered)
  5. Keywords in Spanish (centered)
  6. Abstract (centered)
  7. Keywords (centered)
  8. Introduction
  9. Body of work (chapters and subchapters)
  10. Conclusions
  11. Bibliographical references.

Points 7 through 10 should be justified.

The criteria for evaluating and selecting articles will be as follows:

 

 

  1. Formal Aspects: compliance with orthographic and writing norms and others established in these "Author Guidelines".
  2. Title and abstract: clear and precise description of the article's topic.
  3. Presentation: clear exposition of the problem(s), objectives, and working hypotheses.
  4. Theoretical and methodological foundation: the methodology to be used and the theoretical perspective adopted should be clearly stated.
  5. Bibliography and sources: use of updated bibliography and variety of sources related to the adopted problem. The use of primary sources is positively evaluated.
  6. Results: clear and explicit presentation of research results in the conclusions.

Citations and bibliographical references will follow the Chicago Style, in its 16th Edition. This system has two variants: the "footnote system" and the "author-year system." In Revueltas, we recommend the author-year system. If you need a detailed guide on how to cite, we recommend reviewing the following link: [link provided]. The Chicago Style used by the journal establishes, among others, the following form:

Bibliographic Sources

Bibliographic references should be inserted within the text indicating in parentheses the author's last name, year of publication, and page(s). Example: (Garretón, 1991, pp.43-49)

When the author is named in the text, only the year and page(s) are indicated. Example: ... considering the above, Garretón (1991, pp. 43-49) argued that the so-called processes of democratic transition ...

When citing multiple works by the same author, it should be noted (Garretón, 1991; 1995; 2007)

When an author has more than one publication in the same year, the publication year is accompanied by a lowercase letter. For example: ... in two recent texts (Gómez, 2010a, p. 15; Gómez, 2010b, p. 69) it is indicated that ...

When there are more than one author in a work (2 or 3) it is noted as follows: (Alcántara and Freidenberg, 2003, p. 83); (Valdivia, Álvarez, and Pinto, 2006, p. 25)

When there are more than 3 authors (Garretón et.al., 2004, p.37) Bibliographic references should be located at the end of the article, following a strict alphabetical and chronological order, following the following forms:

Book with one author.

Angell, A. (1993). Chile de Alessandri a Pinochet: en busca de la utopía. Santiago: Editorial Andrés Bello.

 

Book with two authors.

Cristi, R. y Ruiz, C. (1992). El pensamiento conservador en Chile. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria.

Book with three authors.

Valdivia, V., Álvarez R. y Pinto, J. (2006). Su revolución contra nuestra revolución. Santiago: Lom Ediciones.

 

Book with more than three authors.

Fontaine, A et.al. (2008). Reforma de los partidos políticos en Chile. Santiago: PNUD, CEP, Libertad y Desarrollo, Proyectamérica y CIEPLAN.

 

Book with an editor.

Ríos, N. (ed.). (2010). Para el análisis del Chile contemporáneo. Aportes desde la Historia Política. Valparaíso: Ediciones Taller de Historia Política.

 

Chapter in an edited book.

Gómez, J. C. (2010). Democratización y Democracia en la Historia Política reciente de Chile. En  Ríos, N. (ed.), Para el análisis del Chile contemporáneo. Aportes desde la Historia Política (pp. 49-60). Valparaíso: Ediciones Taller de Historia Política.

 

Article in a Journal with one author.

Godoy, O. (1999). La transición chilena a la democracia: Pactada. En Estudios Públicos (Nº 74), 79-106.

 

Article in a Journal with two authors.

Barozet, E. y Aubry, M. (2005). De las reformas internas a la candidatura presidencial autónoma: los nuevos caminos institucionales de Renovación Nacional. Revista Política (n°45), 165-197.

Internet References.

Moya, P. (2006). Pinochet en Londres: análisis comparativo de la prensa que cubrió su arresto, aproximación desde el Análisis Crítico del Discurso. En Cyber Humanitatis (Nº37). Consulta 27 de Agosto de 2011: http://www.cyberhumanitatis.uchile.cl/CDA/texto_simple2/0,1255,SCID%253D18483%2526ISID%253D646,00.html

Internet References.

Moya, P. (2006). Pinochet en Londres: análisis comparativo de la prensa que cubrió su arresto, aproximación desde el Análisis Crítico del Discurso. En Cyber Humanitatis (Nº37). Consulta 27 de Agosto de 2011: http://www.cyberhumanitatis.uchile.cl/CDA/texto_simple2/0,1255,SCID%253D18483%2526ISID%253D646,00.html

Primary Sources Newspaper and/or non-scientific magazine references. It should be included within the text indicating in parentheses the newspaper name, date, and page(s). Example: ... as indicated at that time (La Tercera, February 18, 1998, p.6), the government had to yield...

Audiovisual References. It should be included within the text indicating in parentheses the name of the director and the date of production. Example: ... as stated in a recent documentary (Said, 2001), the sensitivity of the Chilean right...

In the case of the bibliographic reference, it should be noted at the end of the text indicating the director's last name, year of production in parentheses, name of the documentary or film in italics, and duration. Example: Said, M., (2001). I love Pinochet. 53 minutes.

Reflections: Presents well-founded, analytical, and critical reflections on one of the thematic axes of our journal. They can be, or not, the result of research projects - completed or ongoing -, conferences, or master classes, constituting a contribution to the consolidation of a southern epistemology. Reflection articles are subject to the same formal requirements as articles, except for their length, which should not exceed 20 pages.

Reviews: Reviews of books published in the last five years are published, as well as evaluative comments on theses or dissertations completed by undergraduate, master's, or doctoral students. Maximum length of 5 pages letter size.

Academic Communications: Presentations or conferences held at high-quality scientific meetings within the past year will be published. They must correspond to works from research with public, private, or self-financing (independent researchers). In the case of public or private organizational sponsorship, the name of the project, entity, registration, or code, duration period must be indicated. Academic communications are subject to the same formal requirements as articles, except for their length, which should not exceed 10 pages.

Sources and Documents for Popular Social History: Unpublished or little-known primary sources are published, along with a presentation by a researcher, highlighting the importance and value of the documents reviewed. Studies of sources and documents for Popular Social History are subject to the same formal requirements as Research Articles, except for their length, which should not exceed 10 pages.

 

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.